FedRAMP Key Security Indicators, explained
FedRAMP 20x asks providers to prove security outcomes with 46 Key Security Indicators in ten themes. What a KSI is, how it links to NIST controls, what each class must do, and what agencies should ask for.
By FedXchange ·
FedRAMP 20x asks cloud service providers to prove their security with Key Security Indicators (KSIs) instead of long written descriptions of controls. A KSI names a security outcome, such as "privileged accounts are disabled when there is suspicious activity," and the provider shows, with measures and data, that the outcome holds. This post explains what KSIs are, how many there are, how they relate to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) SP 800-53 controls, what each certification class must do with them, and what agencies should look for.
What a KSI is
A control says what protection must exist. A KSI says what result the protection must produce, and asks the provider to measure it. FedRAMP puts it this way: controls "define required protections," while KSIs "provide measurable validation that those protections are functioning properly."
Each KSI has three parts in FedRAMP's rules:
| Part | Example: KSI-IAM-SUS |
|---|---|
| Name | Responding to Suspicious Activity |
| Statement of the outcome | Accounts with privileged access are disabled or otherwise secured in response to suspicious activity. |
| Related NIST SP 800-53 controls | AC-2, AC-2(1), AC-2(3), AC-2(13), AC-7, PS-4, and PS-8 |
FedRAMP is deliberately vague about how to meet each one. It says the activities "vary considerably by cloud service offering." The provider decides what to measure and how. FedRAMP also warns providers not to treat KSIs as a paperwork exercise. It wants engineers, not only compliance staff, to build the measures.
The ten themes and 46 indicators
The Consolidated Rules for 2026 (CR26), published in June 2026, list 46 KSIs in ten themes. Every one is marked stable.
Cloud Native Architecture (CNA)
8 indicators. Least functionality, a small attack surface, restricted network traffic, logical networks, and availability.
Service Configuration (SVC)
8 indicators. Automated configuration and secret management, encryption, integrity checks, and removing unwanted data.
Identity and Access Management (IAM)
6 indicators. Automated accounts, passwordless sign-in, least privilege, just-in-time access, and machine accounts.
Monitoring, Logging, and Auditing (MLA)
5 indicators. A security information and event management (SIEM) system, log review, and who may read logs.
Policy and Inventory (PIY)
5 indicators. Automatic inventories, executive support, security investment, secure development, and vulnerability disclosure.
Change Management (CMT)
4 indicators. Logged changes, redeploying instead of editing, and automated testing during deployment.
Recovery Planning (RPL)
4 indicators. Recovery objectives, backups, recovery plans, and recovery tests.
Incident Response (INR)
3 indicators. Reviewing procedures, reviewing past incidents, and after action reports.
Supply Chain Risk (SCR)
2 indicators. Finding and reducing supply chain risk, and watching third-party software for vulnerabilities.
Cybersecurity Education (CED)
1 indicator. Reviewing whether training works, for all staff and for high-risk roles.
Source: FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026, machine-readable rules file, version 2026.10.08.01.
Source: FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026, machine-readable rules file, version 2026.10.08.01. 46 indicators in all.
Show the numbers
| Indicators | |
|---|---|
| Cloud Native Architecture | 8 |
| Service Configuration | 8 |
| Identity and Access Management | 6 |
| Monitoring, Logging, and Auditing | 5 |
| Policy and Inventory | 5 |
| Change Management | 4 |
| Recovery Planning | 4 |
| Incident Response | 3 |
| Supply Chain Risk | 2 |
| Cybersecurity Education | 1 |
Many of the statements use the word "persistently." FedRAMP defines it as an activity that repeats in cycles over a long period, even if not without gaps, and whose status "will always be known." A KSI is not met once at assessment time. It is met every day the service runs.
How KSIs relate to NIST controls
KSIs do not replace the NIST SP 800-53 catalog. FedRAMP's rules file links each KSI to the controls it covers. Across all 46 indicators, the file names 209 different controls and control enhancements.
Some KSIs cover a lot of ground. "Authorizing Just-in-Time" (KSI-IAM-JIT) links to 38 controls, and "Ensuring Least Privilege" (KSI-IAM-ELP) links to 34. Two link to none: "Optimizing for Availability" (KSI-CNA-OFA) and "Reviewing Executive Support" (KSI-PIY-RES). Those two measure outcomes that the control catalog does not name directly.
Source: FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026, machine-readable rules file, version 2026.10.08.01, field "controls." Counts include control enhancements.
Show the numbers
| Linked controls | |
|---|---|
| KSI-IAM-JIT Authorizing Just-in-Time | 38 |
| KSI-IAM-ELP Ensuring Least Privilege | 34 |
| KSI-MLA-OSM Operating SIEM Capability | 18 |
| KSI-RPL-ARP Aligning Recovery Plan | 16 |
| KSI-CNA-MAT Minimizing Attack Surface | 14 |
| KSI-IAM-APM Adopting Passwordless Methods | 13 |
| KSI-PIY-RSD Reviewing Security in Development | 12 |
| KSI-SCR-MIT Mitigating Supply Chain Risk | 12 |
| KSI-SVC-SIN Securing Information | 12 |
For an agency, the links matter. They show which of the agency's own control questions a provider's KSI evidence helps answer.
What each class must do
FedRAMP 20x certifies services in four classes, from Class A (least assurance) to Class D (most). The KSI rules grow stricter with each class.
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Which KSIs | 7 named KSIs, plus an approved outside framework | All that apply | All that apply | All that apply |
| Automated checks for each KSI | May use them | Should use at least 1 | Must use at least 2 | Must use at least 4 |
| Metrics in the Security Decision Record | May include | Should include 30-day and yearly summaries | Must include summaries and all daily data, up to a year | Must go well beyond Class C; details set in the Phase 4 pilot |
| Independent assessment of all KSIs | Follows the outside framework | At least once a year | At least once a year | At least once a year |
Sources: FedRAMP rules FRC-CSX-VVK, SDR-CSX-KMT, IVV-CSX-AIA, FRC-CLA-ASF, and FRC-CLA-MFR.
Source: FedRAMP rule FRC-CSX-VVK. Class A may use automated checks but need not; Class B should use at least 1; Classes C and D must use at least 2 and 4.
Show the numbers
| Automated checks | |
|---|---|
| Class A | 0 |
| Class B | 1 |
| Class C | 2 |
| Class D | 4 |
Class A works differently. A Class A provider must hold a certification from the past 12 months under FedRAMP Rev5 (the older FedRAMP process), SOC 2 Type II, or GovRAMP. On top of that, it must address 7 named KSIs:
- Logging Changes (KSI-CMT-LMC)
- Restricting Network Traffic (KSI-CNA-RNT)
- Reviewing All Training (KSI-CED-RAT)
- Automating Account Management (KSI-IAM-AAM)
- Adopting Passwordless Methods (KSI-IAM-APM)
- Reviewing Incident Response Procedures (KSI-INR-RIR)
- Securing Information (KSI-SVC-SIN)
Five KSIs are optional for Class B and required for Class C:
- Enforcing Intended State (KSI-CNA-EIS)
- Authorizing Log Access (KSI-MLA-ALA)
- Preventing Residual Risk (KSI-SVC-PRR)
- Removing Unwanted Data (KSI-SVC-RUD)
- Validating Communications (KSI-SVC-VCM)
Where the evidence lives
KSI evidence goes into the Security Decision Record (SDR). That is the 20x replacement for the system security plan: a record of the provider's security decisions, kept current over the life of the service. For each KSI, the provider must give a short summary of five things:
- The measures that show the KSI, and what each one is for. If there are none, the reason and the risk to customers.
- How often each persistent measure runs.
- A check that the measures really show the KSI.
- A check that the automation is accurate and enough, or why a measure does not need automation.
- Proof that the measures are produced correctly and working as intended.
Sources: FedRAMP rules SDR-CSX-KSI, SDR-CSX-KMT, FRC-CSX-VVK, and IVV-CSX-AIA, and the FedRAMP Key Security Indicators page.
Read the steps as text
- Define measures. The provider picks measures that show the outcome, with an objective for each.
- Collect automatically. Automated checks gather evidence on a set cycle. Class B should run 1 per KSI; Class C must run 2.
- Watch for drift. Alerts flag when a resource moves away from its intended state.
- Record in the SDR. Summaries go in the Security Decision Record. Class C adds daily data for up to a year.
- Assess every year. An independent assessor covers all KSIs at least once a year for Classes B to D.
- Improve. Findings and incidents change the measures, and the cycle repeats.
FedRAMP also says providers should apply all KSIs to every part of the service inside the Minimum Assessment Scope.
What this means for agencies
A KSI-based package reads differently from a Rev5 package. Instead of paragraphs about each control, you get measures, cycles, and data. Here is how to use it:
- Ask for the metrics. A Class C provider must keep daily KSI data for up to a year. Ask how long each measure has run, and what it showed when something went wrong.
- Check the class against your use. Class A covers 7 KSIs and leans on an outside framework. FedRAMP presumes Class A is adequate only for pilots, testing, or negligible-risk use.
- Map KSIs to your own controls. Each KSI lists the NIST controls it supports. Use those links to see which parts of your system security plan the provider's evidence helps with, and which parts remain yours.
- Read the reasons for gaps. A provider may skip a measure if it explains the reason and the risk to customers. Those explanations are where your risk decisions start.
- Keep reviewing. Agencies must review every Ongoing Certification Report the provider sends every 3 months. Ask that changes to KSI measures be included.
FedXchange tracks FedRAMP's rules and the federal guidance behind them, and writes agency policies and procedures that name the services an agency uses. The governance tracker lists CR26 and watches FedRAMP's rules file for changes.
Sources
- FedRAMP, Key Security Indicators, the overview for providers.
- FedRAMP, Key Security Indicators reference, all 46 indicators with their statements and linked controls.
- FedRAMP, Consolidated Rules for 2026, machine-readable rules file, fedramp-consolidated-rules.json, version 2026.10.08.01 (October 8, 2026). The counts in this post come from this file.
- FedRAMP, FedRAMP Certification rules: FRC-CSX-VVK (automated checks by class), FRC-CSX-MAS, FRC-CLA-ASF, and FRC-CLA-MFR (Class A).
- FedRAMP, Security Decision Record rules: SDR-CSX-KSI and SDR-CSX-KMT.
- FedRAMP, Independent Verification and Validation rules: IVV-CSX-AIA.
- FedRAMP, Collaborative Continuous Monitoring rules for providers: CCM-OCR-AVL, and for agencies: CCM-AGM-ROR.
- FedRAMP, Certification classes for agencies.
- NIST, SP 800-53 Rev. 5.
Get new posts and federal governance by email
A weekly email on Fridays, an alert on the day the watch finds something new, or both. Free.